Cosmetovigilance: Advancing Safety, Awareness, and Public Health
Abstract
Cosmetovigilance plays a vital role in ensuring the safety of cosmetic products by monitoring, detecting, and preventing adverse effects associated with their use. Despite its significance, awareness and implementation of cosmetovigilance remain limited. Studies indicate that while approximately 46.1% of healthcare professionals and consumers are aware of the concept, only a small percentage actively report adverse reactions. The lack of formal monitoring systems, self-diagnosis, and underreporting of mild to moderate adverse events contribute to the low number of documented cases. The cosmetic industry has evolved significantly, incorporating complex formulations to meet consumer demands. However, the absence of standardized scientific methods to evaluate long-term dermal exposure raises concerns about the safety of cosmetic ingredients. Furthermore, the rise of counterfeit beauty products in the market poses additional risks, making consumer education and regulatory vigilance crucial. National and international cosmetovigilance programs are necessary to monitor and regulate the safety of cosmetic products. These programs can help eliminate hazardous ingredients, enforce stringent safety measures, and enhance consumer confidence in the industry. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, increasing public awareness, and encouraging healthcare professionals to report adverse reactions are key steps toward improving cosmetovigilance practices.
Downloads
References
https://doi.org/10.4321/s1886-36552012000400006
2. Hwisa NT, Gindi S, Rao CB, Katakam P, Rao Chandu B. Evaluation of Antiulcer Activity of Picrasma Quassioides Bennett Aqueous Extract in Rodents. Vedic Res. Int. Phytomedicine. 2013;1:27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.24911/IJMDC.51-1572153924
3. Al-Saleh I, Al-Enazi S, Shinwari N. Assessment of lead in cosmetic products. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology. 2009 Jul 1;54(2):105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.02.005
4. Ayenimo JG, Yusuf AM, Doherty WO, Ogunkunle OA. Iron, lead, and nickel in selected consumer products in Nigeria: A potential public health concern. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry. 2010 Jan 1;92(1):51-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240902830680
5. Kiranmai M, Renuka P, Brahmaiah B, Chandu BR. Vitamin D as a promising anticancer agent. https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12541
6. Sarma P, Kumar H, Medhi B. Cosmetovigilance in India: Need of the day. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2017 Sep 1;49(5):341-3. https://journals.lww.com/iphr/toc/2017/49050
7. Nama S, Chandu BR, Awen BZ, Khagga M. Development and validation of a new RP-HPLC method for the determination of aprepitant in solid dosage forms. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical
Research.2011;10(4):491-7. https://doi.org/10.3126/mjmms.v1i2.46497
8. Trivedi MK, Kroumpouzos G, Murase JE. A review of the safety of cosmetic procedures during pregnancy and lactation. International journal of women's dermatology. 2017 Mar 1;3(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.01.005
9. Othman AS, Abd Rahman I, Teoh N, Omar AR, Osman LH. An empirical study on the factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of cosmetic products. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH). 2022 Jun 27;7(6):e001512-. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i6.1512
10. Alessandrini A, Piraccini BM. Essential of hair care cosmetics. Cosmetics. 2016 Sep 27;3(4):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics3040034
11. Sautebin L. A cosmetovigilance survey in Europe. Pharmacological research. 2007 May 1;55(5):455-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.022
12. Gindi S, Methra T, Chandu BR, Boyina R, Dasari V. Antiurolithiatic and invitro anti-oxidant activity of leaves of Ageratum conyzoides in rat. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013 Feb 8;2:636-49.
https://doi.org/10.4321/s1886-36552012000400006
13. Fiume M, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Klaassen CD, Marks JG, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW, Andersen FA. Final report on the safety assessment of sodium cetearyl sulfate and related alkyl sulfates as used in cosmetics. International journal of toxicology. 2010 May;29(3_suppl):115S-32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810364665
14. Saraogi P, Kaushik V, Chogale R, Chavan S, Gode V, Mhaskar S. Virgin coconut oil as prophylactic therapy against alcohol damage on skin in COVID times. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2021 Aug;20(8):2396-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14258
15. Fiume MM, Heldreth B, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks Jr JG, Shank RC, Slaga TJ, Snyder PW. Safety assessment of diethanolamine and its salts as used in cosmetics. International journal of toxicology. 2017 Sep;36(5_suppl2):89S-110S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581817707179
16. De Groot AC, White IR, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Coenraads PJ. Formaldehyde‐releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy: Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact dermatitis. 2010 Jan;62(1):2-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01615.x
17. Uddin S, Rauf A, Kazi TG, Afridi HI, Lutfullah G. Highly sensitive spectrometric method for determination of hydroquinone in skin lightening creams: application in cosmetics. International journal of cosmetic science. 2011 Apr;33(2):132-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00599.x
18. Matsumoto M, Todo H, Akiyama T, Hirata-Koizumi M, Sugibayashi K, Ikarashi Y, Ono A, Hirose A, Yokoyama K. Risk assessment of skin lightening cosmetics containing hydroquinone. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2016 Nov 1;81:128-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.005
19. Sainio EL, Jolanki R, Hakala E, Kanerva L. Metals and arsenic in eye shadows. Contact dermatitis. 2000 Jan;42(1):5-10. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042001005.x
20. Mertens S, Gilissen L, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cocamide diethanolamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Jul;75(1):20-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12580
21. Wong S, Street D, Delgado SI, Klontz KC. Recalls of foods and cosmetics due to microbial contamination reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Journal of food protection. 2000 Aug 1;63(8):1113-6. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.8.1113
22. Mertens S, Gilissen L, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cocamide diethanolamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Jul;75(1):20-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12580

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.